Sunday, February 28, 2016

My vote - Best Actress 2015

Not sure if I am reviving the old Best Actress analysis tradition, but just had a bit of time on my hands and wanted to check again the Best Actress performances nominated for 2015 and make a final decision on my ranking, because it feels like an unusual year (all 5 are rich performances, but I don’t fully love one or the other in particular) and it’s hard to choose a winner.

So here are some quick thoughts on these performances:

1. Charlotte Rampling as Kate Mercer, in 45 Years

Call me a sucker for European realness. A European actress in a low budget European drama, giving a subtle, realistic, unglamourized performance. I had to warm up to Charlotte’s acting here, but objectively speaking this is the performance to reward: it shows the most technique, the most experience, great ability of owning the camera in all those close-ups. It’s very subtle, too subtle for my taste, but that’s the price to pay in order to stay real to the mood of the film. The character’s arc is remarkable and skilfully played out – Charlotte manages to create a Kate that we recognize, that we care for and, ultimately, that we feel so damn sorry for.

2. Cate Blanchett as Carol Aird, in Carol

A great director like Todd Haynes helps a lot in making a great performance shine even stronger. The flawless style and classiness of the film benefit Cate’s performance – they create an aura around her: as a result of the way she is shot  and placed in the centre of Therese’s fantasy, this becomes a mysterious, sexy, glamorous performance. Cate brings intelligence and experience. It’s a performance accused of mannerisms and an unnatural feel, but to me those subtle diva-like accents fit the description of the character –a smart woman dealing with depression and loneliness by putting a façade, but also an expert at flirting who knows how to play the game.

3. Saoirse Ronan as Eilis, in Brooklyn

This is the performance with the emotional punch. There’s the telephone conversation scene that might beat anyone’s acting moment of the entire group of nominees. Saoirse gives a performance that feels authentic, believable, mostly likeable, charming, and innocent, that brings drama and romance and naiveté at the key moments. So why isn’t this my #1 choice? So hard to say, I’m basing it on feeling, on my fading interest in the film, on me not understanding or believing the character’s actions in the second half. But even I must admit: the sane people have this on top of their rankings, because it clicks most boxes, and it is indeed an achievement.

4. Brie Larson as Ma/Joy, in Room

Brie carries the first half of the film, the Room section, with great ability, dedication and dramatic feel. It’s so good that it makes it believable and, when Jacob is not stealing the scene, she’s right there with him, as a balancing act, bringing to the story the tragedy of the character and situation – it can be seen on her face, in her very expressive eyes. Her realisation of what she has to do in order to save themselves feels heartbreakingly honest and what the film needs to nail the horror. But the second half brings a different focus on the character and, as the dramatic intensity of the story fades, so does the film’s interest in Joy. Overall, it’s a great performance, but uneven throughout the film.

5. Jennifer Lawrence as Joy, in Joy

Jennifer is the shining light in this mess of a film David O. Russell put together and I don’t even think her performance is that much to begin with. To her credit, she’s charismatic and pulls it off by somehow handling the problematic dialogue. No surprise that she stands out more in the couple of dramatic scenes, where the tone of the film doesn’t feel like an unintentional joke. While she gets plenty of screentime, the screenplay and the story work against her, generating random and/or absurd scenes to throw the actors in. It’s more a 2 1/2, but I’m feeling generous.

Conclusion: I wouldn’t be surprised if in 6 months from now Brie would be my #1 or #2 pick, because I love my actresses in dramatic scenes and because, while different, the top 4 performances rank very similarly to me.

How the voting will go: Brie will win the Oscar easily. Saoirse is probably the runner-up, but not close enough. Room overperformed in terms of nominations and that helps Brie a lot. Charlotte would be 3rd, I guess, and the other two actresses really have absolutely no chance of winning.

For previous Best Actress years/rankings, just look over on the right, for a column with various years.
Nice writing this. J

Sunday, September 20, 2015

Best Actress – Emmys edition

Disclaimer: I didn’t spellcheck and posted in a hurry. Sorry about that. :)


In a way, I am picking up where I left off last year, ranking the Emmy nominated performances for Actress in a Drama Series and Actress in a Comedy Series. As I do every year, I watch the submission tapes like any other voter does / should do. And I rank in order of preference, and after that: how I think the race will go down!
My ranking:



1. Taraji P. Henson, for Empire  -  4 stars

The episode & the show: I don’t watch the show, but I didn’t dislike what I saw in the pilot (Taraji’s submission). I hear it’s the best episode she could have chosen. Presenting the pilot to the voters tends to help.

The performance: It has the right amount of loud diva, strong female and also that touch of vulnerability, some tears and plenty of scenes where you empathize / feel sorry for the character / cheer her on. Although she doesn’t dominate through screentime, she’s the one to remember from the episode. The show loses strength when she’s not on screen. Feels like a winner.


Honestly, I am confused by the ranking from here on:

2. Robin Wright, for House of Cards – 3 stars

The episode & the show: The writing was too much on the nose. I am not a regular viewer of House of Cards, but it has a style that I like, visually that is. The secondary storyline in the episode was weak and confusing.

The performance: I feel like I need to explain this; she’s so up the rankings because I like Robin, I like the character, I still think she should’ve won for season 1... OK, that has nothing to do with it. Based on the episode: she gets enough screentime, she hits a couple of high notes in the last scene with Spacey, but only 3 stars because it needed just a touch more drama, a bit more emotion on her face. Everything is very (effectively) discreet.


3. Viola Davis, for How to Get Away with Murder – 3 stars

The episode & the show: My first time watching the show. It’s not as bad as Scandal, but definitely not something I’d care to watch in the future.

The performance: Here I feel the need to justify AGAIN – she is good, but I could see right through the performance, if that made sense. In a way, it’s the opposite of Robin’s performance – there’s little subtlety, it’s all either in the lines or on Viola’s face, who often overplays the emotions (and she gets an entire spectrum of them this episode). I preferred her last scene with her husband to all the courtroom / investigation noise.


4. Elisabeth Moss, for Mad Men – 3 stars

The episode & the show: I love Mad Men. I’ve seen every episode. I liked the finale A LOT and Peggy is one of my favourite characters from the show, if not from my entire TV watching life.

The performance: ... therefor anyone who knows me would be shocked she’s only 4th, in a gigantic 4-way tie. But truth is she had more impactful episodes this season. While she is good in the few scenes she gets in this episode, they feel somewhat unusual for her character, I was one who didn’t want the love story play out, because it didn’t feel believable. Elisabeth is good, but not impactful enough, it’s Jon’s episode.


5. Claire Danes, for Homeland – 3 stars

The episode & the show: I don’t watch the show. I hear she had better episodes this season.

The performance: Honestly, this could’ve been my #2 for all I know. Decided on the ranking on the spot. She gives her usual manic, yet solid performance, like she does every year, but it’s not as impactful as it was last year, and it feels a bit one-note: always in a rush. I think she should’ve won last year based on episode, this is more of a happy to be nominated tape.


6. Tatiana Maslany, for Orphan Black – 2 stars

The episode & the show: What the fuck was that? (aka: I never seen this before)

The performance: Because the episode was so damn confusing, the performance(s) got a bit muddy in my brain. I stopped caring, and then we got a really fine scene where a dead “clone” character (Beth?) comes back in a hallucination, and that was a scene of good, solid, dramatic work. But the material overall stopped me from enjoying whatever was happening.


That is my ranking.

Who will win? I see two front-runners: Taraji and Robin. Taraji has the submission and the buzz over Empire and the whole let’s make Emmys history buzz. Robin has the screentime and also the important episode, with social issues and big scenes for her character. Of course, Viola is 3rd, and she could very well win, but some won’t like the show. Elisabeth is 4th, Tatiana 5th, let’s say, because she might her some high rankings from die-hard fans, and Claire 6th, because by now I think they’re over rewarding her.

Reminder: the voters rank the performances, it’s not a pick a winner system.


And on the Comedy side...



1. Lisa Kudrow, for The Comeback4 ½ stars

The episode & the show: I am not a fan of the show, but I admire it. It’s uncomfortable for me to sit through something this emotionally painful. J I also hear she didn’t submit her best (the finale), which is always sad to hear. It’s a juicy episode nonetheless.

The performance: Lisa’s face is a national treasure: she is so expressive and needs no dialogue line to express exactly what we’re imagining her character feels (most of the times embarrassment, that is). The episode (and the series) is such a one-woman show and she delivers in every scene. I like her triumphant moment at the end, to show a bit of range and some optimism. It’s a performance that needs to be seen to be understood, and I sure hope the voters are paying attention.


2. Julia Louis-Dreyfus, for Veep – 4 stars

The episode & the show: Veep is a show I watch and really like. She definitely submitted the right tape, the season finale.

The performance: In a weird way, I wanted to like it less, because I want Lisa to win (I guess most of us do), but I was charmed by all the funny scenes she gets to play in this episode. It’s the kind of comedy that brings almost sitcom-ish reactions and she’s funny and on point throughout the episode. The sharp screenplay helps a lot, and she delivers excellent lines with that great JLD timing.


3. Amy Schumer, for Inside Amy Schumer – 3 stars

The episode & the show: I have only seen clips on Youtube (but plenty of them). I was very surprised by how weak her episode submission was, to be honest.

The performance: As I said, I expected much more. There was not one particular skit (is that what they’re called?) that knocked it out of the park, but the one where she plays the invisible police detective justified the 3 stars I am awarding her. Other than that, it’s all only partly funny, and it feels almost partly-acted. Too much real life Amy in the episode, I guess.


4. Edie Falco, for Nurse Jackie – 2 ½ stars

The episode & the show: I don’t watch the show. She submitted the series finale.

The performance: Usually, when an actor/actress submits the series finale, they’re considered a threat. But this episode was SO dramatic, it has nothing to do with this category. Those who have seen the final scene will understand what I mean. Seriously: how do you judge it when you know it’s Drama?! For a dramatic performance, Edie gives her usual strong performance; other than a couple of tears, there isn’t a whole lot of range though. Category fraud.


5. Lily Tomlin, for Grace & Frankie – 1 ½ stars

The episode & the show: My first experience with the show. She submitted the season finale. It wasn’t good.

The performance: Maybe I don’t get Lily Tomlin, even though I loved her performance in Nashville back in the day. Her performance here felt forced, fake, that talk on the phone at the start of the episode was so clumsily acted/directed, you could tell it was faked, she didn’t even try to make it real. Her big scenes are the emotional ones towards the end, but even then it’s either Waterston or Jane Fonda who does the heavy lifting. I don’t get the show, nor the nomination.


6. Amy Poehler, for Parks and Recreation – 1 ½ stars

The episode & the show: I don’t watch it. Just like Edie (and Elisabeth in Drama), Amy too submitted the series finale. Not good.

The performance: I’m gonna get a lot of hate for ranking this so low. To me, the episode was bad and the performance just a series of reactions from Amy, in various, absurd situations that the screenplay places her in. None of the humour from throughout the series. It was just unintentionally sad. No need to get into it.


Who will win? Probably Julia. From then on, it’s almost anyone’s guess. I think Amy Schumer 2nd, based on the incredible year she’s had. Lisa is 3rd, if they watch the episode. Some say Amy P might win, based on a sentimental vote, but I have her in 4th because her tape is so bad. Lily T is 5th, but I wouldn’t be shocked if she wins. And Edie officially has zero chances of winning.


And that’s it. Let’s see how it goes.


Tuesday, August 12, 2014

Best Actress – Emmys edition

I am following the now yearly tradition of watching the episodes that the ladies nominated for Actress in a Comedy Series and Actress in a Drama Series have submitted – and judging (more or less objectively) their episodes, just like the regular Emmy voter does.

The first part of the judging is just my ranking based on MY preference (not who I think will win). Here we go:


1. Claire Danes, for Homeland (episode “The Star”)
My connection to the show: I don’t follow the show, but I was familiar with the characters, from previous Emmy submissions. This episode was the Season 3 finale and a surprisingly good episode.
The performance: It took me by surprise, because we all know Claire loves A-C-T-I-N-G, especially with this particular role, but the performance here was pleasantly underacted most of the times. She stayed true to the character, but without overdoing it, like she tends to do. Her performance was very effective, with the help of some damn good writing; expressing her insecurities about the baby was the highlight scene.

2. Julianna Margulies, for The Good Wife (episode “The Last Call”)
My connection to the show: I have seen every episode. It’s not my favourite show on TV, but I still enjoy watching it.
The performance: It was probably the best tape she could’ve submitted and Julianna does a fine, if not great, job, as usual. My problem here – and why I didn’t choose it as my vote – is that the performance in this particular episode is quite one-note. There is little range, just a lot of grieving – which is done effectively, but I couldn’t help wanting some more. Too much of the same thing (writing’s fault).

3. Michelle Dockery, for Downton Abbey (episode 4.1, which in fact is 4.1 + 4.2)
My connection to the show: I have seen every episode and I generally love it. I find it relaxingly snobbish.
The performance: I must be one of the very few people who get Michelle’s acting and see the talent and the work put into making it seem effortless. Let’s face it: the dialogue is tough and she gets some impossible lines (in this episode including), but she manages to deliver them so gracefully that I must give extra points for it. She gets 2 hours, but the 2nd hour is rather useless; the good stuff is in the first half and she gets right a series of tricky scenes that lead towards a nicely done crying scene. I approve.

4. Robin Wright, for House of Cards (episode Chapter 26)
My connection to the show: I don’t watch it. The only other episode I’ve seen was Robin’s submission tape from last year.
The performance: Last year she was my choice for the winner, but Claire won (as I predicted). Her tape this year, however, is underwhelming to say the least – she’s barely in it and her scenes make little sense for those who don’t follow the show. She gets almost nothing to do – I have her in 4th and not lower just because she’s stylish, sexy, tough and super-fierce, all which make me subjective. But really, there isn’t much to this submission.

5. Lizzy Caplan, for Masters of Sex (the pilot episode)
My connection to the show: I have discovered the show now, by watching the pilot. I have no desire to continue with the series.
The performance: Here is where I get even more subjective – this is a fine submission and she gets plenty of screentime. She’s talented, she acts well with what she gets, but there’s something (missing?) that makes me care too little about her performance and presence in this episode. It’s all nicely delivered, I just wasn’t too impressed.

6. Kerry Washington, for Scandal (episode “The Fluffer”)
My connection to the show: Another terrible episode from a really terrible show. Who watches this?! Awful.
The performance: Not much to say expect it was bad. Not only is the writing terribly weak, and she is surrounded by actors giving their worst, Kerry herself does a poor job this time. She delivers those pathetic lines by mostly overdoing it – too grandiose or giving them too much meaning. There’s no subtlety, just the same facial tricks and big words that fall flat.

Who do I think WILL win: It’s a tough-tough call between Claire and Julianna Margulies. I think Julianna might win, because everybody seems to dislike Homeland lately and The Good Wife is quite hot right now. If she doesn’t win, than Claire is definitely a close 2nd. I’m going to say Robin is 3rd, not based on the episode, but on her recent increase in popularity – I suspect people from show business like her. I wouldn’t be surprised if Lizzy wins, because her show has the novelty factor. Kerry is probably 5th and Michelle last (just because people underestimate her effort).


1. Julia Louis-Dreyfus, for Veep (episode “Crate”)
My connection to the show: I’ve seen every episode and I do enjoy it.
The performance: This is a good submission for her, maybe even better than last year’s. She’s funny and, more importantly, she shows a lot of range, going from bitchy to sad, from reacting to disastrous situations to enjoying her victory moment. It’s all in here and she does an excellent job. That bathroom scene is now a classic.

2. Lena Dunham, for Girls (episode “Beach House”)
My connection to the show: You know how much I hated her submission last year. Needless to say, I don’t follow. Not a fan of hers.
The performance: No, hell hasn’t frozen yet. The fact that I am ranking her 2nd is proof of how weak this category is, at least judging from the submissions. But I can look objectively enough to say she’s good in it: not particularly funny, but less annoying that usual. She gets two big confrontation scenes and she does a great job delivering the character’s intentions and feelings. It was good.

3. Melissa McCarthy, for Mike & Molly (episode “Mind over Molly”)
My connection to the show: I don’t watch it, it seems a bit light on the writing front.
The performance: One of those cases where it really is hard to judge, since the highlights of the performance come from more dramatic scenes rather than funny. She opens with something of an SNL kind of moment that I didn’t particularly enjoy, but the 2 scenes about her father really ARE touching and well-acted. I still can’t buy the two leading characters as a couple, nor do I understand Molly’s breakdown, but that’s less relevant here.

4. Taylor Schilling, for Orange Is the New Black (episode “The Chickening”)
My connection to the show: I have seen this first season and I liked it.
The performance: I initially thought she might be a threat to win my vote, but then she submitted this. I think the pilot would’ve been a wiser choice, at least screentime-wise. Because it feels like Taylor is barely in this episode, with the other characters doing their own thing, often more interesting. She is eclipsed by Red every time they share a scene and overall she ends up looking just a bit whinny. Taylor does comedy well and I still like her, but this tape is not a winner.

5. Amy Poehler, for Parks and Recreation (episode “Recall Vote”)
My connection to the show: I don’t follow it. I’ve seen an episode here and there.
The performance: Maybe her worst tape for this role. The other storyline that doesn’t involve her (with the chair) is way funnier and more interesting; Amy gets some boring writing that’s never truly funny. She gets to play drunk, but it doesn’t really succeed and overall I felt like she didn’t put too much effort into it. Was there no better episode?!

6. Edie Falco, for Nurse Jackie (episode “Super Greens”)
My connection to the show: I don’t watch it. An episode here and there.
The performance: Talk about not funny. Edie is a great actress, but there’s no comedy in here and the dramatic scenes feel a bit like been-there-done-that. It ends up feeling boring and lacking any special element.

Who do I think WILL win: The only way Julia is losing this race is if they are really really really tired of giving her yet another Emmy (which I doubt). Her tape is the funniest, and also the overall best of the group. If they’re tired of Julia, I think they’ll go with Melissa, based on her popularity and the emotional factor of her episode. But this means they’ll have to actually watch the tapes. I would say Taylor is 3rd, based on the popularity of the show. Amy is probably 4th just because she’s Amy Poehler. Lena is 5th, since her show is not that hot anymore and Edie doesn’t stand a chance of winning.

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

My vote - Best Actress 1989

I might have said this more than once in the past, but this year’s ranking was a difficult task, because it came down to seeing the actual performances one more time (after a first look) to decide on who subjective game, of course; I need to put this as a disclaimer, since I doubt there are any other bloggers to agree with my #1 pick. Also, for the first time ever, all the 5 performances received the same number of stars from me. I guess that makes it a really good year for this category.
will be my winner. And even then I had my doubts, but I went with the most constant performance, that also struck an emotional chord. Doing this ranking is a

So, choosing #1 was a complicated task, but it was mostly between two performances, so #2 followed easily once it was decided it won’t be the winner. This #2 would’ve been my guess for the win when it all started, and I am still surprised I didn’t end up choosing her. J This performance is so up my alley. There’s little difference between #3 and #4, and #5 is also very close. There’s no need to add more.

To see how they got nominated, click here. And this is MY ranking:

1. Jessica Tandy, Driving Miss Daisy

The screentime: approximately 55 minutes and 5 seconds (57.7% of the film)

The film: The film is not an epic, it’s not a big production or a film with a complicated plot, like other Best Picture winners. It’s simple, but charming and very well written. Some thoughts on it: LINK.

The role: Jessica plays Miss Daisy Werthan, a stubborn widow in 1948 Georgia, who is forced by her son to accept having a driver, which creates both funny situations and a lifelong friendship.

The performance: This is a performance that could’ve been clichéd or downright awful, but it’s saved, and few people give Miss Tandy credit for it. In the hands of a Bette Davis or a Katharine Hepburn, it would’ve been a disaster. Jessica brings a strange delicacy to the role, femininity and a sparkle of youth that balance well with the sarcastic attitude in the more comedic scenes. The acting is so beautiful and pleasant and reassuring, backed up by smart dialogue, that you almost don’t see it as acting. It combines the funny with the emotional; the role could’ve been so mechanical, but Jessica still had the hunger for acting, so it feels full of life.

The highlight: As they stop on the side of the road, on their way to Mobile, Alabama, for a sandwich, Miss Daisy relives the first time she saw the ocean. With the camera on her face, there is such a loving emotion in her eyes that I was taken by surprise and felt instant sympathy.

2. Isabelle Adjani, Camille Claudel
The screentime: approximately 91* minutes and 27 seconds (59.8% of the film) [*must note I have seen the 158 min version, not the 175 min]

The film: The first half of this long biographical film is more interesting, while the second half is less focused, slightly boring. Some thoughts on it: LINK.

The role: Isabelle plays Camille Claudel, the temperamental and ambitious young sculptor who becomes the mistress and protégé of the famous Auguste Rodin.

The performance: The film relies so much on her beauty, her expressive eyes and the love that the camera has for her. What is not in writing, she can compensate by one look of despair or shame. This is a flashy role, mostly in the better sense: there’s no holding back on the tears and the screaming, but as the screenplay doesn’t always rise to the occasion, it sometimes feels in vain. But even as the craziness of Camille is poorly explained, Isabelle tries to create something of an arc for her: there’s a distinctive regress. With one of the most beautiful faces in history, tears like no other, and enough energy to make it work, Isabelle’s performance is mostly a success.

The highlight: Her last scene with her father combines nicely the confusion of the woman slipping into madness and the shame of the daughter trying to reconnect with real life. Perfectly delivered vulnerability.

3. Michelle Pfeiffer, The Fabulous Baker Boys

The screentime: approximately 47 minutes and 16 seconds (43.4% of the film)

The film: It’s easy to watch and it has a couple of good scenes that almost make it memorable. The story is nicely balanced. Some thoughts on it: LINK.

The role: Michelle plays Susie Diamond, a high-class call girl who turns singer, bringing a breath of fresh air to the duet of two piano playing brothers.

The performance: I know everyone loves this performance, and I respect it more than love it. To me the role is less challenging and I give Michelle credit for delivering almost perfectly what was required. And what she does get is a damn good scene towards the end and a couple of comedic touches, for which she finds just the right timing. She is sweet, and likeable, and her presence does improve the film a lot. There’s vulnerability, and smarts, tears played at the right moment and the camera loves her. I didn’t really understand why the character was so chill about being a prostitute, and I also don’t think her singing was that good. Sorry. But still: an almost 4.

The highlight: Her big scene with Jeff, which basically makes the performance work. The you’re full of shit. You’re a fake speech is very well delivered.

4. Jessica Lange, Music Box

The screentime: approximately 83 minutes (71% of the film)
The film: It starts with poor writing and slow pace, and then gradually gets better and better. Some thoughts on it: LINK.

The role: Jessica plays Ann Talbot, an American lawyer of Hungarian origins, who has to defend her father when he is accused of horrible war crimes.

The performance: Here is a performance in what I like to call the “Angelina in Changeling” category, meaning it has such low or mediocre acting choices, but the highs are so impressive that you can’t ignore them. Just like the film, the performance starts on a bad note: Jessica creates this overly-precious, delicate woman that’s just boring to watch. But as the trial starts, the film gets better, and Jessica’s acting becomes more real, more dynamic. The music box discovery is a memorable moment, but what justifies my ranking (and me calling this one of the few Lange film performances I really like) is that breath-taking confrontation scene that might just be this category’s best acted scene. The fear in her eyes, combined with anger and despair is pricelessly acted. But I must cut points for the weak start, so this is an almost 4.

The highlight: As I said, the big confrontation scene with her father. Perfect.

5. Pauline Collins, Shirley Valentine

The screentime: approximately 78 minutes and 11 seconds (73.9% of the film)

The film: It’s dated through its execution, but very relevant through its theme of dissatisfaction and changing your life; surprising. Some thoughts on it: LINK.

The role: Pauline plays Shirley, a funny and lively woman, who likes to talk to herself. She realizes how unhappy she’s been with her life and decides to escape to the Greek islands.

The performance: It feels a bit stupid to have Pauline in 5th, since I loved the film, and the film depends almost entirely on her acting. And she is lovely, she really is: I like it a lot, but for some reason I just can’t rank her higher. She is fun to look at, has a great delivery of the funny lines and a good understanding of the dramatic aspects of the film. The constant look of surprise on her face works both for her, because it helps bring the laughs, but also makes it all look so easy and the character arc less noticeable outside of the plot. It has a charming lack of vanity. An almost 4.

The highlight: Maybe the scene on the bus, thinking of her life: Shirley Valentine turned into this.

How did the Academy vote? Well, the older voters in the Academy got their way, so Jessica Tandy won (deservingly so, I might say, though I know you won’t agree). The fact that Driving Miss Daisy won Best Picture definitely also had something to do with it. But it was mostly because they liked the performance, I guess, and because Tandy was such a respected theatre legend. At 80 years old she was (and the record still stands) the oldest winner in the Best Actress category. #2 was a very close runner-up, clearly Michelle Pfeiffer. They were the only ones with a shot at winning this. The other 3 had no chance. From there on, it’s a guessing game. You’ll definitely doubt me, but I think Isabelle was a very distant #3; hear me out: even though it’s a foreign-language performance, and we know how they feel about those, it’s also a very flashy one, with a lot of acting, in a biographical film that was also up for a Foreign Language Oscar. More so, Adjani was a worldwide movie star, having been nominated before. I would guess that Pauline was #4 (random thought; not 3rd, because she was little known despite the Tony win, and it’s a small film) and Jessica 5th (the Academy wasn’t in any hurry to give her a 2nd Oscar, and Music Box seems to have plenty of haters).

What’s next: For the first time since... I don’t know when, there won’t be a draw like there usually is. I still have 30s, 50s and 90s to choose from, and I will pick a year myself from those decades. Allen and his great blog have inspired me to want to do 1939 (what a year!) and that’s the one up next. 

But before that, I’ll share my thoughts on Emmy’s Best Actress – Drama & Best Actress – Comedy races, watching the submissions, ranking the nominees, I’ve done it before. ;)

To see other BEST ACTRESS years discussed so far, you can go to the column on the right.